Research Article Open Access Double-Blind Peer Review

AN IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS OF CONSUMER FOOD SAFETY PRACTICES

John Michael Anderson·Sarah Elizabeth Johnson
Published 23 January 2025
Vol. 12, No. 4 (2024)
pp. 17-29
CC BY 4.0
  1. 1
    John Michael Anderson
    Department of Agriculture, Alcorn State University, Mississippi
    US
  2. 2
    Sarah Elizabeth Johnson
    Department of Agriculture, Alcorn State University, Mississippi
    US

Ensuring food safety is paramount for public health, socio-economic stability, and global trade. Despite growing concerns about food safety, Southwest Mississippi lacks comprehensive research on foodborne illnesses. This knowledge gap hinders the development of effective policies to prevent contamination. To predict consumer behavior, it is crucial to understand how consumers perceive risks and benefits related to food safety. Foodborne diseases, resulting from the consumption of contaminated food or water, pose a significant public health threat in the United States. This study aims to address this gap by investigating consumer perceptions of food safety issues in Southwest Mississippi. The findings will contribute to a more profound understanding of food safety concerns and help in the formulation and implementation of targeted policies. Enhancing food safety measures is imperative not only for safeguarding public health but also for sustaining socio-economic stability and facilitating international trade

JournalColumbia Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences
ISSN3065-0380
Volume / IssueVol. 12, No. 4 (2024)
Pages17-29
Published23 January 2025
Access Open Access
LicenseCC BY 4.0 — reuse with attribution
PublisherKeith Publications
Anderson, J., Johnson, S. (2025). AN IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS OF CONSUMER FOOD SAFETY PRACTICES. Columbia Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 17-29

 Submit Your Research to Columbia Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences

We invite original research articles, review papers, and case studies. Benefit from rigorous double-blind peer review, rapid decision within 4–8 weeks, DOI for every article, and worldwide open-access distribution.