Research Article Open Access Double-Blind Peer Review

WOMEN IN HARD HATS: A GENDERED ANALYSIS OF CONSTRUCTION EDUCATION

Themba Dlamini Sibusiso
Published 04 June 2025
Vol. 13, No. 1 (2025)
pp. 58-79
CC BY 4.0
  1. 1
    Themba Dlamini Sibusiso
    Department of Construction Management and Quantity Surveying, Mangosuthu University of Technology, Durban.
    ZA

Gendered perceptions may determine the aspirations and expectations, as well as the academic and career choice of young people. This article examines the role of gender stereotypes as a predictor of career choices of students in construction. A survey of 229 conveniently sampled students, enrolled in construction-related programmers was conducted. The objectives of the study are to measure the relationship between gender stereotypes and career choice behaviour, and to measure the effect of gender and socio-economic status on how gender stereotypes influence student’s career choices. The Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis test were used to test for significant differences between gender and socio-economic status (SES) groups. Results show that, as opposed to men, women seem to perceive gender stereotypes as having more influence on their career choices than men. The study finds statistically significant differences in gender stereotypes among the low and medium socio-economic Financing barriers, Land regulation. Loan management, Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Urban housing

JournalJournal of Marketing Management and Research
ISSN3065-033X
Volume / IssueVol. 13, No. 1 (2025)
Pages58-79
Published04 June 2025
DOI10.5281/zenodo.15593583
Access Open Access
LicenseCC BY 4.0 — reuse with attribution
PublisherKeith Publications
Sibusiso , T. (2025). WOMEN IN HARD HATS: A GENDERED ANALYSIS OF CONSTRUCTION EDUCATION. Journal of Marketing Management and Research, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 58-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15593583

 Submit Your Research to Journal of Marketing Management and Research

We invite original research articles, review papers, and case studies. Benefit from rigorous double-blind peer review, rapid decision within 4–8 weeks, DOI for every article, and worldwide open-access distribution.