What to Look for When Choosing a Journal
Before submitting your research, evaluate journals on these key criteria:
- Anti-corruption scope — causes, consequences, measurement, and prevention of corruption
- Institutional integrity focus — anti-corruption agencies, transparency laws, and ethical standards
- Open access to reach anti-corruption practitioners, integrity commissioners, and development agencies
- Fast review for anti-corruption research tied to active integrity reform processes
- Acceptance of case studies, comparative research, and quantitative corruption measurement
- Coverage of grand, petty, and political corruption in diverse governance contexts
Recommended Journals — Cluster 9: Public Policy, Governance & Administration
All journals below are published by Keith Publications — open access, peer-reviewed, and indexed for global discoverability.
-
Public Policy and Administration Studies Journal
(PPASJ)
Public policy analysis, public administration, governance reform, government management, policy implementation, public sector innovation, and the study of governmental institutions and their effectiveness.
Public Policy Public Administration Governance Reform Policy Implementation
Fast Publication: Keith Publications journals complete initial review within 2–5 business days and full peer review within 2–4 weeks. Articles are published online within 5–10 days of acceptance — making us one of the fastest open access publishers in public policy and governance research.
Core Research Areas in Anti-Corruption Research
Keith Publications anti-corruption journals accept research on: corruption measurement — perceptions-based indices, experience surveys, and objective corruption proxies; causes of corruption — institutional, cultural, economic, and political determinants; consequences of corruption — effects on economic growth, investment, public services, and political legitimacy; anti-corruption strategies — what works? Evidence on enforcement, prevention, and education approaches; anti-corruption institutions — anti-corruption agencies, inspector generals, ombudsman offices, and their effectiveness; public procurement corruption — risk factors, detection methods, and control mechanisms; political corruption — campaign finance corruption, electoral manipulation, and legislative corruption; whistleblowing — protections, incentives, and the role of whistleblowers in corruption detection; civil society and media — the role of journalism and citizen monitoring in combating corruption; and international anti-corruption frameworks — UNCAC, OECD anti-bribery convention, and enforcement.
Measurement and Methodology in Corruption Research
Corruption research faces a fundamental methodological challenge — corruption by its nature is hidden, making direct measurement difficult or impossible. Researchers have responded with creative approaches: exploiting variation in corruption perceptions across survey respondents; using bidding patterns in public procurement to detect collusion; analysing financial disclosures for unexplained wealth; studying the economic effects of anti-corruption enforcement actions; and conducting laboratory experiments on bribery behaviour. Keith Publications welcomes innovative methodological approaches to corruption measurement and causal identification in anti-corruption research, recognising that methodological rigour is especially important when studying a phenomenon that is deliberately concealed.
Tips to Maximise Your Acceptance Chances
- Align your research with the journal's scope — confirm your policy domain and methodology fit the journal's published focus.
- Establish clear analytical framework — policy and governance journals expect a clearly stated analytical or theoretical framework.
- Demonstrate policy relevance — make the policy implications of your research explicit and actionable.
- Rigorous methodology — clearly describe your data sources, case selection, analytical approach, and limitations.
- Follow formatting guidelines exactly — non-compliant manuscripts often face desk rejection without review.
- Draw clear conclusions — public policy research should end with clear, evidence-based conclusions for policy and practice.
- Use current and relevant sources — include recent policy documents, official statistics, and academic literature from the last 5 years.
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Research Guides
Explore other research journal guides in the Public Policy, Governance & Administration cluster: