Research Article Open Access Double-Blind Peer Review

RECONSTRUCTING GENDER ROLES: EXPLORING CAREER PERCEPTIONS AMONG CONSTRUCTION STUDENTS

Maria van der Merwe Annelie
Published 02 June 2025
Vol. 13, No. 1 (2025)
pp. 1-30
CC BY 4.0
  1. 1
    Maria van der Merwe Annelie
    Department of Construction Management and Quantity Surveying, Mangosuthu University Of Technology, Durban, South Africa
    ZA

Gendered perceptions may determine the aspirations and expectations, as well as the academic and career choice of young people. This article examines the role of gender stereotypes as a predictor of career choices of students in construction. A survey of 229 conveniently sampled students, enrolled in construction-related programmers was conducted. The objectives of the study are to measure the relationship between gender stereotypes and career choice behavior, and to measure the effect of gender and socio-economic status on how gender stereotypes influence student’s career choices. The Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis test were used to test for significant differences between gender and socio-economic status (SES) groups. Results show that, as opposed to men, women seem to perceive gender stereotypes as having more influence on their career choices than men. The study finds statistically significant differences in gender stereotypes among the low and medium socio-economic groups.

JournalInternational Journal of Banking and Financial Services
ISSN3065-0615
Volume / IssueVol. 13, No. 1 (2025)
Pages1-30
Published02 June 2025
DOI10.5281/zenodo.15574157
Access Open Access
LicenseCC BY 4.0 — reuse with attribution
PublisherKeith Publications
Annelie, M. (2025). RECONSTRUCTING GENDER ROLES: EXPLORING CAREER PERCEPTIONS AMONG CONSTRUCTION STUDENTS. International Journal of Banking and Financial Services, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 1-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15574157

 Submit Your Research to International Journal of Banking and Financial Services

We invite original research articles, review papers, and case studies. Benefit from rigorous double-blind peer review, rapid decision within 4–8 weeks, DOI for every article, and worldwide open-access distribution.