Research Article Open Access Double-Blind Peer Review

BARTER TRADE HURDLES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PRACTITIONERS AND NON-PRACTITIONERS' VIEWS

Elizabeth Ann Thompson
Published 25 June 2024
Vol. 1, No. 1 (2024)
pp. 37-49
CC BY 4.0
  1. 1
    Elizabeth Ann Thompson
    Department of Marketing Management, University of Johannesburg and Department of Business Management, University of Johannesburg
    ZA

Barter trade, often perceived as a relic of ancient economies, persists as a significant mode of exchange in contemporary commerce across the globe. Despite Adam Smith's characterization of barter as primitive, recent reports indicate its enduring relevance in both developed and developing economies. The Universal Barter Group (2008) highlighted its prevalence, with a substantial portion of global business conducted on a non-cash basis in 2004, involving a considerable share of entities listed on major stock exchanges and small businesses in the United States. While precise statistics on contemporary barter trading are scarce, indications from sources such as the Small Business Association (2008) and the International Reciprocal Trade Association (IRTA) (2009) suggest a growing trend. This resurgence, noted by researchers since the early 1990s, raises questions among economists, as observed by Davis (2009) and Carlin et al. (1999). Understanding the persistence and resurgence of barter trade in modern economies is essential for comprehending its implications on market dynamics, economic development, and policy formulation

JournalInternational Journal of Banking and Financial Services
ISSN3065-0615
Volume / IssueVol. 1, No. 1 (2024)
Pages37-49
Published25 June 2024
Access Open Access
LicenseCC BY 4.0 — reuse with attribution
PublisherKeith Publications
Thompson, E. (2024). BARTER TRADE HURDLES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PRACTITIONERS AND NON-PRACTITIONERS' VIEWS. International Journal of Banking and Financial Services, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 37-49

 Submit Your Research to International Journal of Banking and Financial Services

We invite original research articles, review papers, and case studies. Benefit from rigorous double-blind peer review, rapid decision within 4–8 weeks, DOI for every article, and worldwide open-access distribution.